City of Madison, Wisconsin
|
Cycling Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
| Links to |
City
cycling office or resources |
http://www.ci.madison.wi.us/transp/bicycle.html
|
|
| |
City
cycling map |
http://www.ci.madison.wi.us/transp/Bicycle/BikeMap/BikeMap.html |
|
| |
|
|
Updated - 2006-09-03 - 05
|
|
| General
Impressions
|
|
| |
"Madison
– The City of Cycling Highways"
|
|
| |
|
Cycling through the city on a network of off-road
bike trails is one of the pleasant experiences in Madison. Occasionally,
one needs to go on the road for part of the ride. Frequently, these roads
are quiet or have bike lanes. Part of one trail is abutted with community
gardens where the “farmers” rent the ad by the amount they occupy.
|
|
| |
|
This network of of-road trails would appeal
to a much broader base of the public and encourage them to consider cycling
as their transportation mode for the next trip. Having a fleet of buses
that will take bikes enhances the use of the trails.
|
|
| Cycling Mode Share |
|
Reported as approximately 8%. Definitely,
there is a critical mass of cyclists making drivers aware that cyclists
will be about.
|
|
| Vision for Cycling |
|
Madison is at the Gold-Level Bicycle Friendly
Community (BFC) rating. The Bicycle Friendly Community Campaign is an awards
program that recognizes municipalities that actively support bicycling.
A Bicycle-Friendly Community provides safe accommodation for cycling and
encourages its residents to bike for transportation and recreation. The
League of American Bicyclists administers the Bicycle Friendly Community
Campaign. |
|
| |
|
At the opening session to the Pro Walk Pro Bike
2006, Madison’s Mayor David Cieslewicz announced that he is unhappy
to always be behind Davis, CA which has a platinum rating. He has set up
a committee whose job it is to draw up a plan to make Madison a Platinum-Level
Bicycle Friendly Community. |
|
| |
|
In discussion with one member of this committee,
one was very unsure of this plan would be anything more than a technical
exercise, rather than being approached from a visionary perspective focusing
on what would draw people to cycling instead of using their cars. |
|
| Building the Network for a Specific
Customer Base or for a City Strategy or Vision - Human Factors Considerations
|
|
When this question was asked the engineer responded
quickly on what roads they were going to apply bike lanes and which not
and which roads would not receive any cycling infrastructure treatment.
When asked if the system is being designed for current cyclists or to
draw non-cyclists to cycle, there was no response.
A vision of cycling in the future for Madison was not offered.
|
|
| Network Planning Direction
|
|
• All collector streets to have bike lanes
• Selected arterial streets to have bike lanes • Continually
evolve bike trails and connect with trails leading to other population centres
(ex. Milwaukee, Dodgeville, Illinois and Chicago) • Some streets
will not have cycling facilities or be signed as the cycling volume is sufficient
that drivers are aware that cyclists will be present. It is assumed here
but not confirmed, except for State St, where posted speed limit is 25 kph,
which motorized traffic is operating at the speed of cycling. |
|
| Traffic Count |
|
It was reported that University Avenue handles
40,000 cars per day and 8,000 to 10,000 bicycles. It was reported that
the Mona Lake Trail handles 1,000 to 1,500 cyclists per day.
|
|
Network Strength
|
|
The cycling highway, i.e. bike trails, that
allows commuting throughout greater Madison and reduces catchment area between
bike routes to a short, acceptable distance is the strength of the cycling
infrastructure of this city. Madison should be proud of it and other municipalities
should envy it and try to duplicate it. The usage of the trails indicates
the high acceptance of trails that are removed from street motorized traffic.
|
|
| |
|
Critical mass is another strength of the network
here. Having a large university certainly helps. Having it located in short
distance from downtown is another strength. It can be assumed that this
city being a state capital would also be a strength to realizing a good
bicycling network.
|
|
| Opportunities for Improvement
|
|
• Trail Capacity - Many of the trails
have been around for a few years and are out of capacity, requiring widening.
The scenario was given that originally trails were built with 8 feet width,
then it was 10 feet, and now it is 12 feet. Well, they should be now built
for 5 metres and, in addition, pedestrian and cyclists should be separated
with each having their own trail. • Maintenance – The older
trails and many bike lanes need maintenance work in bringing the surface,
ramps, and line painting to acceptable cycling levels that will not deteriorate
personal health, especially the spine. • Signage – While
good in parts, there still is room for improvement in route signage, direction,
and destination information for tourists and for new cyclists. •
Cycling Traffic Counting – On the Monona Lake Trail one intersection
has automatic counters on the three entries into an intersection. Beyond
monitoring a couple of streets there is no monitoring program. This needs
improvement. • Bike Parking – While State St. has significant
bike parking on the street, it is still much below what the demand is. This
holds for other streets as well and for the conference centre. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |