| Cycling
Infrastructure - |
Rail-Trail |
|
| |
G.
S. Mickelson Trail in Black Hills of Southern Dakota |
 |
|
Trail Map - http://www.sdgfp.info/parks/regions/northernhills/mickelsontrail/trailheads.htm |
|
Trail Official Web Sites
-http://www.sdgfp.info/parks/regions/northernhills/mickelsontrail/index.htm-
for description of trail and amenities
|
|
| Updated - This page is under
development and the notes may not refer tothe trail at thsitime. Please
check back. |
|
General
Comments
|
|
 |
General Impressions |
This 59 kilometres trail that starts on the
north-west corner of Spokane at the 9-Mile Dam, then drops down to downtown
Spokane and then runs eastwardly to the state line and then further into
Idaho and Coeur d’Alene by a further 38 kilometres. This paved trail
has some road sections with bike lanes. It is a well used trail.
|
|
| |
|
The portion west of downtown Spokane would appeal
more to confident, strong cyclists who do not get turned off by some significant
hill climbing. This portion of the trail would not appeal to families, young
cyclists, or those either starting out or thinking of cycling.
|
|
| |
|
The eastern section of the trail does, very
definitely, appeal to the young, the beginners, and the less physically
strengthen cyclists, as well as the racer types. You could describe it
as basically flat with any hill climbing limited to 10 to 20 metres vertically
with 5% or less grades. Most of the trail was just flat. We saw many children
using this section of the trail. In some ways the sections further from
Spokane were busier with cyclists than close in.
|
|
| |
|
The western section of the trail ran through
some interesting pine forest and semi-arid rolling hills. The path tends
to be very wide in most places, two lane width. Basically, for most parts
the path seems to be a forest fire road with restrictions on usage by
cars. There were short sections of shared roadway.
|
|
| |
|
What was very apparent was that this trail
was not designed for families, for encouraging people to start cycle,
or encourage nervous or hesitant cyclists to get out and improve their
skills. The hills were just too steep for that and too long. For racing
cyclists it was a good training trail for the next Tour de France. For
commuter cyclists it was not effective compared to paralleling roads with
their paved shoulders bike lane width.
|
|
| |
Trail Naming |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Scenery |
The alignment of the trail allowed for continuous
changes in interesting vistas, including the river, the hills, and the distant
mountains. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Safety Features |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Trail
Infrastructure
|
|
| |
Trail Alignment |
|
|
| |
Trail Grade |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Access to the Trail - Entrances from
Adjacent Roadways |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Trail Width |
In the western end, parts of the trail were
on shared roads, others on a two-laned closed forest road, and parts on
a 4 metres wide path. The pavement surface was in good quality.
|
|
| |
Trail Surface |
|
|
| |
Trail Pavement Markings |
|
|
| |
Trail Lightening |
|
|
| |
Separation from Motorized Traffic |
Trail was far enough from neighbouring roads
so that the sounds of the birds could be heard, not that of cars. |
|
| |
Off-Road Path |
|
|
| |
Bike Lanes |
|
|
| |
Two-Way Bike Lanes on Road – Not Separated |
|
|
| |
Two-Way Bike Lanes on Road – Physically
Separated |
|
|
| |
Two-Way Bike Lanes on Road Shoulder –
Vertically Not Separated |
|
|
| |
Two-Way Bike Lanes on Road Shoulder –
Vertically Separated |
|
|
| |
Intersection Design - Signalized |
|
|
| |
Intersection Design – Not Signalized |
|
|
| |
Trail Bridges |
|
|
| Trail and Railway Tracks |
|
|
|
| |
No Physical Separation |
|
|
| |
Physical Separation |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Trail Signage |
|
|
|
| |
Signage – Destination
|
|
|
| |
Signage – Direction |
|
|
| |
Signage – Information |
|
|
| |
Signage – Warning |
|
|
| |
Signage - Intersection |
|
|
| |
Signage - Grades |
|
|
| |
Signage - |
|
|
| |
Signage |
Signage, including destination, direction, information,
and warning, was plentiful. The question is whether it is visible enough
or can be easily missed when cycling by. Caution signs of upcoming steep
slopes and visibility issues on curves were plentiful.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Trail Amenities |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Trail User Facilities |
Restroom facilities and car parking trailheads
were bountiful.
|
|
| Marketing of the Trail |
|
|
|
| |
Communication - Trail Maps |
|
|
| |
Communication - Trail Web Site |
|
|
| Trail and the Local Economy |
|
|
|
| |
Business and Retailing |
|
|
| |
Food and Drink |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Opportunities
for Improvement
|
|
| |
Trail Grade |
For appealing to a more cyclists and for commuter
cyclists, there needs to be more sections of very level trail with minimum
grade changes.
|
|
| |
Food and Drink |
Places for drinking water were missing along
with places for obtaining food.
|
|
| |
Signage |
Lack of signage on neighbouring roads directing
cyclists to the trail.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |